Teaching as Inquiry

This is the next post in my series on effective pedagogy from the 2007 New Zealand Curriculum. These have all been written for the purposes of provoking thinking at Lynfield College.

The 2007 New Zealand Curriculum introduced Teaching as Inquiry as an important teacher practice. It stated “Since any teaching strategy works differently in different contexts for different students, effective pedagogy requires that teachers inquire into the impact of their teaching on their students.” (NZC, pg 35)

This is supported by Graham Nuthall’s (Hidden Lives of Learners) research that showed how students assimilate new information differently because of their prior learning and experiences. It also links well with the adage: “Just because you have taught something, doesn’t mean the students have learned something.” Essentially, we should be taking notice of how each individual learner is progressing through their learning programmes.

The NZC then set out the following diagram as to how this inquiry could be visualised:

Graeme Aitken and Claire Sinnema developed this Teaching as Inquiry model as part of their work on the Social Sciences Best Evidence Synthesis. At a recent Education Hub seminar, Graeme said that Teaching as Inquiry was intended as an approach to practice and a basis for discussion and collaboration. It could also be a source of evidence for ongoing professional learning and appraisal.

Teaching as Inquiry was influenced by the knowledge that teaching is an uncertain practice or craft. The complex world of the classroom is influenced by so many factors.  Teaching as Inquiry was a model developed to help teachers navigate this complexity and adjust our practices to help our learners. It is not just about adapting curriculum but also adapting ourselves to our students.

The development of Teaching as Inquiry was also influenced by other publications from the Best Evidence Synthesis series being compiled at that time. Quality Teaching for Diverse Students in Schooling: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES] emphasised the importance of focusing on student outcomes and using both research evidence and assessment information to improve teaching and learning. It also highlights the need to ensure that teaching is responsive to students’ learning processes. Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES] confirms what many teachers had always suspected – that teacher learning is of crucial importance to student learning.

Here at Lynfield College, a group of teachers including our Specialist Classroom Teacher of the time, Sarah Parker, trialled Teaching as Inquiry in 2011. The success of these trials saw it become a school-wide practice in 2012. Led by Lexie Ridling, Lynfield developed a strong culture of Teaching as Inquiry over the next few years.

In those early years, the Faculty Leaders were very active in helping the inquiries relate to student achievement and classroom practice. Robinson and Lai argue that this is a key part of ensuring the quality of inquiry: “Teachers who are skilled in processes of inquiry can detect weaknesses in their own thinking about practice and help others to do the same.” (Practitioner Research for Educators, page 6).

In 2017 Lynfield made the shift to all teachers taking part in collaborative inquiries. This reflected much of the emerging research around the power of collaborative inquiry. Kaser and Halbert (2009) state “Collaboration and Inquiry combined in a powerful way will improve student learning. Jane Gilbert and Derek Wenmoth in their thinkpieces for the Education Council both focused on how increasing the interactions between teachers, students and school leaders will increase our capacity for learning and improving. Graeme Aitken at the recent Education Hub Teaching as Inquiry seminar highlighted the point that Teaching as Inquiry was never intended as a solitary endeavour.

This year, we have evolved our collaborative inquiry to focus on starting from the needs of targeted students. This captures the spirit of the Spirals of Inquiry approach as developed by Kaser and Halbert. New Zealand research has also highlighted the importance of starting from student needs: “Teaching as Inquiry is more of a mindset towards teaching, where students’ needs are central and refinements to teaching are continuous.” (Conner, 2015, p1)

To me, the power of Collaborative Inquiry is still summed up best by Timperley, Kaser and Halbert (2014 paper accessed from here):

“Innovation floats on a sea of inquiry and that curiosity is a driver for change. Creating the conditions in schools and learning settings where curiosity is encouraged, developed, and sustained is essential to opening up thinking, changing practice, and creating dramatically more innovative approaches to learning and teaching.”


1 thought on “Teaching as Inquiry

  1. Teaching has always been tentative and ambiguous, but with a moral imperative, which can be a source of dissonance. The McDonald triangle is very telling.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s